HostDGAI vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
DGAI (BNB Chain) vs 牛来 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
DGAI vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| DGAI | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.8438 | $0.06338 |
| Market cap | $145.03M | $79.34M |
| 24h volume | $3.28M DEX | $1.47M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.57M | $1.42M |
| FDV | $966.85M | $79.34M |
| Holders | 8,642 | 64,716 |
| Age (days) | 46 | 52 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- DGAI measures ~1.8× the market cap of 牛来
- DGAI measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~7.5× the holder count of DGAI
- over the shared window DGAI moved −13.7% while 牛来 moved −43.5%
What the data says
DGAI
DGAI — DGrid AI on BNB Smart Chain, 0x10d4183389e99233db3cc981c43443ebd28ebd5e — is a 23-day-old AI-themed token with a market profile that deserves reading slowly: $1.6 million of tracked liquidity as of October 9, 2026, against roughly $27.7 million of 24-hour volume.
That volume-to-liquidity ratio — better than 9x — is the number that matters on this page. For the pool to cycle nine times its depth in a day, the same capital is churning through repeatedly, a pattern associated with market-maker activity and momentum desks rather than organic holder flow. High volume on a young token is not evidence of broad demand; it is evidence of activity, and those are different claims.
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $79.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.4 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DGAI or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: DGAI (BNB Chain) measures $145.03M and 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $79.34M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DGAI or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: DGAI (BNB Chain) grades B and 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DGAI and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show DGAI at −13.7% and 牛来 at −43.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.