HostDEBIT vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
DEBIT (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
DEBIT vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| DEBIT | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.43 | $0.02842 |
| Market cap | $34.39M | $43.87M |
| 24h volume | $2.53M DEX | $6.76M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.21M | $1.16M |
| FDV | $199.69M | $43.87M |
| Holders | — | 92,257 |
| Age (days) | 15 | 224 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of DEBIT
- over the shared window DEBIT moved −36.7% while 龙虾 moved −89.0%
What the data says
DEBIT
DEBIT — trading under the project name Teller on BNB Smart Chain, at 0x66661c7229901f568f16bd1551b3ba826f83ce49 — shows $1.2 million of liquidity and roughly $19.2 million of 24-hour volume in the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Two things want separating here. The name: "Teller" is associated with a lending protocol that has operated across chains, and a DEBIT symbol on BSC is not automatically that project — the address above is the identity, and any claim of protocol lineage needs verifying at the contract, not the ticker. The numbers: near 7x daily turnover against liquidity is hot speculation by any standard, whatever the project behind it is.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.9 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $1.2 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DEBIT or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: DEBIT (BNB Chain) measures $34.39M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $43.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DEBIT or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: DEBIT (BNB Chain) grades B and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DEBIT and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show DEBIT at −36.7% and 龙虾 at −89.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.