HostDAI.E vs LINK.E — price, size and safety, side by side
DAI.E (Avalanche) vs LINK.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
DAI.E vs LINK.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| DAI.E | LINK.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $14.26 |
| Market cap | $10.81M | $10.67B |
| 24h volume | $71.63K | $16.06K |
| Liquidity | $95.28K | $91.58K |
| FDV | $10.81M | $5.21M |
| Holders | 43,641 | 13,081 |
| Age (days) | 1,250 | 1,121 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~987× the market cap of DAI.E
- DAI.E measures ~4.5× the 24h volume of LINK.E
- DAI.E measures ~3.3× the holder count of LINK.E
- over the shared window DAI.E moved +0.75% while LINK.E moved +9.81%
What the data says
DAI.E
DAI.E at 0xd586e7f844cea2f87f50152665bcbc2c279d8d70 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of MakerDAO's dollar stablecoin — the ".e" suffix marking the original bridge's claim — 1,250 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $10.8 million market cap on 10.7 million local units.
The book is workable and the tape is the liveliest of the legacy ".e" floats: $95.3 thousand of tracked depth on $133.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $91.6 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DAI.E or LINK.E?
By tracked market cap: DAI.E (Avalanche) measures $10.81M and LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.67B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DAI.E or LINK.E?
On the contract checks we publish: DAI.E (Avalanche) grades C and LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DAI.E and LINK.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show DAI.E at +0.75% and LINK.E at +9.81%.
More comparisons
DAI.E vs UPTMIM vs DAI.EDAI.E vs SQUIREDAI.E vs CXOPUNCH vs LINK.EZAUTH vs LINK.ETRCH1 vs LINK.EBUCKAZOIDS vs LINK.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.