HostCTR vs VIRTUAL — price, size and safety, side by side
CTR (Base) vs VIRTUAL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
CTR vs VIRTUAL — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| CTR | VIRTUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01335 | $0.6696 |
| Market cap | $19.00M | $22.88M |
| 24h volume | $704.03K DEX | $399.67K DEX |
| Liquidity | $310.34K | $2.19M |
| FDV | $12.91M | $22.88M |
| Holders | 3,189 | 28,376 |
| Age (days) | 133 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- VIRTUAL measures ~7.0× the liquidity of CTR
- CTR measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of VIRTUAL
- VIRTUAL measures ~8.9× the holder count of CTR
- over the shared window CTR moved +5.36% while VIRTUAL moved −14.7%
What the data says
CTR
CTR passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts CTR at 100/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, CTR is showing $310.34K of on-chain liquidity, 3,189 wallets holding and 133 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $310.34K of depth beside roughly $19.00M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. The 3,189-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of CTR as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
VIRTUAL
VIRTUAL is Virtuals Protocol's token — the asset behind one of crypto-AI's more durable experiments: a platform where AI agents launch as tradable tokens and their activity routes value back to the protocol's token. The mint 3iQL8BFS2vE7mww4ehAqQHAsbmRNCrPxizWAT2Zfyr9y is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $2.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest shape: Virtuals is a platform bet in the crypto-AI cohort — its token's value depends on agents it hosts actually generating sustained activity rather than launch-day volume spikes, which is the failure mode most agent-token platforms hit. The A grade covers the Solana mint; the platform's usage is an off-chain measurement.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTR or VIRTUAL?
By tracked market cap: CTR (Base) measures $19.00M and VIRTUAL (Solana) measures $22.88M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTR or VIRTUAL?
On the contract checks we publish: CTR (Base) grades A and VIRTUAL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTR and VIRTUAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show CTR at +5.36% and VIRTUAL at −14.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.