HostCTM vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
CTM (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
CTM vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| CTM | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2456 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $2.73M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $2.77M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 167 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~630× the liquidity of CTM
- RDK measures ~1,058× the 24h volume of CTM
What the data says
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our September 14, 2026 read shows $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTM or RDK?
By tracked market cap: CTM (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTM or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: CTM (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTM and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show CTM at +2.21% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
CTM vs RYYCTM vs FKBCTM vs CRDCTM vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.