HostCTM vs MKR — price, size and safety, side by side
CTM (Ethereum) vs MKR (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
CTM vs MKR — normalized performance, 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CTM | MKR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2128 | $1.61K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $2.08M DEX | $140.63K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.44M | $1.31M |
| FDV | $69.11M | $146.77M |
| Holders | 4,989 | 75,008 |
| Age (days) | 189 | 1,813 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- CTM measures ~15× the 24h volume of MKR
- MKR measures ~15× the holder count of CTM
What the data says
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our October 9, 2026 read shows $1.4 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
MKR
MKR — 0x9f8f72aa9304c8b593d555f12ef6589cc3a579a2 — is MakerDAO's governance token, caught mid-story: the protocol rebranded to Sky and re-denominated its governance asset (MKR → SKY at 1:24,000) while both tickers trade. This row tracks the original MKR contract — still live, still convertible — which makes its snapshot numbers read strange to anyone who doesn't know the migration is running.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads an $146.8 million fully-diluted value and $1.3 million of tracked depth against 75,008 holders — and a top-10 concentration of 197%, a number that is impossible on its face. Concentration over 100% is not a hidden whale; it is the snapshot double-counting supply that is mid-migration between the two tickers, an honest artifact of measuring a token that is half-converted.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTM or MKR?
By tracked market cap: CTM (Ethereum) measures — and MKR (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTM or MKR?
On the contract checks we publish: CTM (Ethereum) grades B and MKR (Ethereum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTM and MKR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-29 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CTM at −8.81% and MKR at −5.99%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-29→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.