HostCT vs HUMA — price, size and safety, side by side
CT (BNB Chain) vs HUMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
CT vs HUMA — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CT | HUMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3792 | $0.02741 |
| Market cap | — | $55.57M |
| 24h volume | $12.67M DEX | $2.83M DEX |
| Liquidity | $723.44K | $703.26K |
| FDV | $5.50M | $14.64M |
| Holders | 19,722 | 4,721 |
| Age (days) | 9 | 501 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CT measures ~4.5× the 24h volume of HUMA
- CT measures ~4.2× the holder count of HUMA
- over the shared window CT moved +0.86% while HUMA moved −10.4%
What the data says
CT
There's a small gap on this page — CT's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Market-wise, CT carries a $723.44K pool, 19,722 wallets holding and 9 days old as of 2026-10-09. Treat $723.44K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. The 19,722-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
HUMA
There's a lot to like about how HUMA's contract is set up. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HUMA earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HUMA shows $703.26K of on-chain liquidity, 4,721 wallets holding and an established 501-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $703.26K of depth beside roughly $55.57M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 4,721 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CT or HUMA?
By tracked market cap: CT (BNB Chain) measures — and HUMA (BNB Chain) measures $55.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CT or HUMA?
On the contract checks we publish: CT (BNB Chain) grades B and HUMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CT and HUMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CT at +0.86% and HUMA at −10.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.