HostCRV vs LAVA — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs LAVA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CRV vs LAVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| CRV | LAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3436 | $0.01349 |
| Market cap | $539.21M | $8.18M |
| 24h volume | $633.85K | $13.56K |
| Liquidity | $10.48M | $331.36K |
| FDV | $831.96M | $2.75M |
| Holders | 100,872 | 4,745 |
| Age (days) | — | 286 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~66× the market cap of LAVA
- CRV measures ~32× the liquidity of LAVA
- CRV measures ~47× the 24h volume of LAVA
- CRV measures ~21× the holder count of LAVA
What the data says
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 million market cap sits above the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $331.4 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or LAVA?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M and LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $8.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or LAVA?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and LAVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show CRV at 0.00% and LAVA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAIRENDER vs LAVALAVA vs XBTLAVA vs MSUSDLVMON vs LAVA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.