HostCRV vs CRVUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs CRVUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CRV vs CRVUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| CRV | CRVUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3436 | $0.9996 |
| Market cap | $539.21M | $217.72M |
| 24h volume | $633.85K | $7.74M |
| Liquidity | $10.48M | $198.17M |
| FDV | $831.96M | $2.10B |
| Holders | 100,872 | 95,213 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,222 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~2.5× the market cap of CRVUSD
- CRVUSD measures ~19× the liquidity of CRV
- CRVUSD measures ~12× the 24h volume of CRV
What the data says
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $198.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or CRVUSD?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M and CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures $217.72M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or CRVUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and CRVUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show CRV at 0.00% and CRVUSD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAIFWWETH vs CRVUSDCRVUSD vs SASHIMIWBTC vs CRVUSDUSDC vs CRVUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.