HostCRV vs APYUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs APYUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
CRV vs APYUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CRV | APYUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3421 | $1.35 |
| Market cap | $559.04M | $162.66M |
| 24h volume | $948.47K DEX | $2.18M DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.96M | $9.09M |
| FDV | $861.85M | $155.95M |
| Holders | 101,017 | — |
| Age (days) | 1,105 | 191 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~3.4× the market cap of APYUSD
- APYUSD measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of CRV
What the data says
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $559.0 million market cap against an $861.8 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $10.0 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
APYUSD
One detail on APYUSD didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the trading data, APYUSD shows $9.09M of on-chain liquidity and a maturing 191-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $162.66M in market cap, the $9.09M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or APYUSD?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $559.04M and APYUSD (Ethereum) measures $162.66M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or APYUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and APYUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and APYUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CRV at −3.76% and APYUSD at −1.39%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.