HostCRED vs P2P — price, size and safety, side by side
CRED (Solana) vs P2P (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
CRED vs P2P — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| CRED | P2P | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5252 | $0.4004 |
| Market cap | $12.07M | $4.79M |
| 24h volume | $67.29K | $408.69 |
| Liquidity | $978.40K | $994.01K |
| FDV | $12.07M | $10.34M |
| Holders | 2,093 | 552 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- CRED measures ~2.5× the market cap of P2P
- CRED measures ~165× the 24h volume of P2P
- CRED measures ~3.8× the holder count of P2P
What the data says
CRED
CRED is Credible Finance's token — a MetaDAO launchpad issue, which you can read off the mint itself: CREDBHvVqREBCAxMihzr8D1nepHMr2gmQoZWpmgGmeta carries the "meta" suffix that marks a futarchy-governed launch, meaning treasury decisions route through prediction markets rather than a founder's multisig. Our September 16, 2026 read shows $12.1 million market cap, $978 thousand of pool liquidity, and 2,093 holders.
The honest note: the launchpad governance is a real structural difference — treasury moves need a market to approve them — but the holder count is thin for the cap, which is the number that decides whether this is a community or a book. Watch distribution before size.
P2P
P2P is P2P Protocol's token — another MetaDAO launchpad issue, identifiable by the "meta" suffix on the mint P2PXup1ZvMpCDkJn3PQxtBYgxeCSfH39SFeurGSmeta: its treasury and issuance sit under futarchy governance. Our September 16, 2026 read shows $4.8 million market cap ($10.3 million fully diluted), $994 thousand of pool liquidity, and 552 holders.
The honest framing, bluntly: 552 holders is the number that owns this page — that is a book, not a crowd, and a small number of wallets deciding price. The mcap-to-FDV gap (under half circulating) compounds it. Small-cap rules apply at double strength.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRED or P2P?
By tracked market cap: CRED (Solana) measures $12.07M and P2P (Solana) measures $4.79M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRED or P2P?
On the contract checks we publish: CRED (Solana) grades A and P2P (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRED and P2P performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show CRED at +3.82% and P2P at +0.12%.
More comparisons
CRED vs RYYCRED vs FKBCRED vs CRDCRED vs RDKP2P vs RYYP2P vs FKBP2P vs CRDP2P vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.