HostCOW vs PNK — price, size and safety, side by side
COW (Gnosis) vs PNK (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
COW vs PNK — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| COW | PNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1329 | $0.008184 |
| Market cap | $82.07M | $7.52M |
| 24h volume | $7.47K DEX | $1.87K DEX |
| Liquidity | $142.24K | $66.78K |
| FDV | $2.61M | $669.02K |
| Holders | 12,011 | 4,334 |
| Age (days) | 224 | 1,686 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- COW measures ~11× the market cap of PNK
- COW measures ~2.1× the liquidity of PNK
- COW measures ~4.0× the 24h volume of PNK
- COW measures ~2.8× the holder count of PNK
- over the shared window COW moved −6.97% while PNK moved −0.33%
What the data says
COW
One detail on COW didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, COW is showing a $142.24K pool, a holder base of 12,011 and a maturing 224-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $142.24K of depth against a market cap of about $82.07M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: COW reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 12,011-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of COW as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
PNK
One detail on PNK didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the trading data, PNK shows $66.78K of on-chain liquidity, 4,334 wallets holding and 1,686 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $66.78K pool against roughly $7.52M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 4,334-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of PNK as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, COW or PNK?
By tracked market cap: COW (Gnosis) measures $82.07M and PNK (Gnosis) measures $7.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, COW or PNK?
On the contract checks we publish: COW (Gnosis) grades B and PNK (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have COW and PNK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show COW at −6.97% and PNK at −0.33%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.