HostCOOL vs 孙宇晨奖 — price, size and safety, side by side
COOL (Base) vs 孙宇晨奖 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-28.
COOL vs 孙宇晨奖 — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-28
| COOL | 孙宇晨奖 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003149 | $0.0001013 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $17.44M DEX | $17.48M DEX |
| Liquidity | $152.30 | $6.78 |
| FDV | $3.15M | $10.13M |
| Holders | 4,679 | 4,451 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 0 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- COOL measures ~22× the liquidity of 孙宇晨奖
What the data says
COOL
COOL on Base — 0x79db263e9d7539032fede0438474f763e9707b07 — is named, in full, "usdc is cool", a stablecoin in-joke that tells you the meme register before the data does. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $152 of liquidity with roughly $17.4 million of daily volume — turnover near 18x the pool.
That ratio places COOL in the same churn class as the loudest coins in this index slice: the pool cycling its entire depth nearly twenty times a day is coordinated flow, not organic accumulation. The joke name plus the industrial turnover is the standard shape of a Base momentum coin — launched for the meta, market-made for the chart.
孙宇晨奖
孙宇晨奖 on Base — 0x2704da20f48b486b9e047e15d2a71ed9fdcc4b07 — carries a Chinese name translating to "Justin Sun Award", tying itself to the Tron founder's persona. Celebrity-adjacent naming is one of the oldest attention plays in the genre: the name buys recognition, and recognition buys exit liquidity.
The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $6.8 of liquidity with roughly $17.5 million of daily volume — turnover near 3.6x, hot but inside the normal momentum band rather than the mirrored-clone extremes. There is no indication of any connection to Justin Sun or Tron; the name is a theme, not a claim of affiliation.
FAQ
Which is bigger, COOL or 孙宇晨奖?
By tracked market cap: COOL (Base) measures — and 孙宇晨奖 (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, COOL or 孙宇晨奖?
On the contract checks we publish: COOL (Base) grades B and 孙宇晨奖 (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have COOL and 孙宇晨奖 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-28, the measured snapshots show COOL at 0.00% and 孙宇晨奖 at 0.00%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-28; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.