HostCOLLECT vs TWT — price, size and safety, side by side
COLLECT (BNB Chain) vs TWT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
COLLECT vs TWT — normalized performance, 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| COLLECT | TWT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02183 | $0.4872 |
| Market cap | $12.09M | $212.87M |
| 24h volume | $3.04M DEX | $125.27K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.28M | $1.14M |
| FDV | $67.52M | $510.79M |
| Holders | 52,664 | 303,413 |
| Age (days) | 287 | 1,142 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- TWT measures ~18× the market cap of COLLECT
- COLLECT measures ~24× the 24h volume of TWT
- TWT measures ~5.8× the holder count of COLLECT
- over the shared window COLLECT moved +17.8% while TWT moved −17.3%
What the data says
COLLECT
COLLECT at 0x4b3d30992f003c8167699735f5ab2831b2a087d3 — deployed under the name "Collect on Fanable" — is a 269-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12.1 million market cap against a $67.5 million fully-diluted figure on 3.0 billion units at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep for the float and the tape is working: $1.3 million of tracked depth on $1.2 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
TWT
TWT — Trust Wallet Token at 0x4b0f1812e5df2a09796481ff14017e6005508003 — is the utility token of Trust Wallet, the mobile wallet Binance acquired in 2018 and that a large share of BNB Chain retail uses as its front end. TWT's value tracks that distribution: fee discounts, governance nods, and promotional utility inside one of crypto's most-installed wallets.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $212.9 million market cap against an $510.8 million FDV — about 42% of the billion-unit supply circulating, the rest in treasury and lockups — with $1.1 million of tracked pool depth and 303,413 holders.
FAQ
Which is bigger, COLLECT or TWT?
By tracked market cap: COLLECT (BNB Chain) measures $12.09M and TWT (BNB Chain) measures $212.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, COLLECT or TWT?
On the contract checks we publish: COLLECT (BNB Chain) grades A and TWT (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have COLLECT and TWT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-29 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show COLLECT at +17.8% and TWT at −17.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-29→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.