HostCNPY vs 蝴蝶人生 — price, size and safety, side by side
CNPY (BNB Chain) vs 蝴蝶人生 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
CNPY vs 蝴蝶人生 — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CNPY | 蝴蝶人生 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2521 | $0.008746 |
| Market cap | $30.52M | $20.87M |
| 24h volume | $21.28M DEX | $1.62M DEX |
| Liquidity | $329.72K | $319.98K |
| FDV | $8.57M | $29.45M |
| Holders | 14,572 | 68,298 |
| Age (days) | 34 | 30 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CNPY measures ~13× the 24h volume of 蝴蝶人生
- 蝴蝶人生 measures ~4.7× the holder count of CNPY
- over the shared window CNPY moved −12.4% while 蝴蝶人生 moved −44.0%
What the data says
CNPY
CNPY on BNB Smart Chain — 0xc69b16cf18cea1e5d0bb6a1a9db802097790ddd2 — is an eleven-day-old token running the hottest turnover profile in this index slice: $330 thousand of liquidity against roughly $29.9 million of 24-hour volume in the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Eighteen times the pool depth cycling daily is an extreme reading even by BSC's momentum-market standards. For volume to reach that multiple, the same capital is round-tripping the pool continuously — the profile of coordinated desk flow or wash-adjacent activity rather than thousands of independent buyers. It says the market around CNPY is loud; it says nothing about how many distinct hands are doing the trading.
蝴蝶人生
蝴蝶人生 — "butterfly life" — at 0x87ae267002cd1ea0ec86bf3601d4a8ad76a47777 is a 30-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $20.9 million market cap against a $29.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is hot for its age: $320.0 thousand of tracked depth on $1.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool five times daily. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CNPY or 蝴蝶人生?
By tracked market cap: CNPY (BNB Chain) measures $30.52M and 蝴蝶人生 (BNB Chain) measures $20.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CNPY or 蝴蝶人生?
On the contract checks we publish: CNPY (BNB Chain) grades B and 蝴蝶人生 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CNPY and 蝴蝶人生 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CNPY at −12.4% and 蝴蝶人生 at −44.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.