HostCLAUS vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
CLAUS (Ethereum) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
CLAUS vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CLAUS | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003486 | $0.07442 |
| Market cap | — | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $7.65M DEX | $7.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $205.84K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $9.78M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 2,286 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 234 |
| Safety grade | E | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~1.5× the liquidity of CLAUS
- ZAMA measures ~1.5× the holder count of CLAUS
- over the shared window CLAUS moved −79.8% while ZAMA moved −9.23%
What the data says
CLAUS
CLAUS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of 2026-10-09, CLAUS's contract still holds a pause or blacklist lever, leaving the deployer able to freeze or block token transfers for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CLAUS is at E (34/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, CLAUS shows workable liquidity of $205.84K, a holder base of 2,286 and a brand-new 5-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $205.84K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 2,286 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CLAUS or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: CLAUS (Ethereum) measures — and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CLAUS or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: CLAUS (Ethereum) grades E and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CLAUS and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CLAUS at −79.8% and ZAMA at −9.23%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.