HostCLAUS vs WLD — price, size and safety, side by side
CLAUS (Ethereum) vs WLD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
CLAUS vs WLD — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CLAUS | WLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003486 | $0.4975 |
| Market cap | — | $1.86B |
| 24h volume | $7.65M DEX | $65.09K DEX |
| Liquidity | $205.84K | $135.20K |
| FDV | $9.78M | $4.88B |
| Holders | 2,286 | 64,146 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 1,162 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- CLAUS measures ~1.5× the liquidity of WLD
- CLAUS measures ~118× the 24h volume of WLD
- WLD measures ~28× the holder count of CLAUS
- over the shared window CLAUS moved −79.8% while WLD moved −10.1%
What the data says
CLAUS
CLAUS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of 2026-10-09, CLAUS's contract still holds a pause or blacklist lever, leaving the deployer able to freeze or block token transfers for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CLAUS is at E (34/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, CLAUS shows workable liquidity of $205.84K, a holder base of 2,286 and a brand-new 5-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $205.84K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 2,286 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
WLD
WLD — 0x163f8c2467924be0ae7b5347228cabf260318753 — is Worldcoin, the identity network's token distributed to people who let an orb scan their iris. Three years in, it remains one of the widest — and most divisive — distributions in crypto.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $1.9 billion market cap against a fully diluted valuation of $4.9 billion — only about a third of the eventual supply circulates, the rest still locked in the emissions schedule. Tracked on-chain depth is thin for the size at $135.2 thousand; WLD's real liquidity lives on centralized venues. Holders number 64,146, and the day prints -11.1%.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CLAUS or WLD?
By tracked market cap: CLAUS (Ethereum) measures — and WLD (Ethereum) measures $1.86B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CLAUS or WLD?
On the contract checks we publish: CLAUS (Ethereum) grades E and WLD (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CLAUS and WLD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CLAUS at −79.8% and WLD at −10.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.