HostCHIP vs RAIN — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs RAIN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
CHIP vs RAIN — normalized performance, 2026-08-17 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| CHIP | RAIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0455 | $0.008945 |
| Market cap | $96.81M | $7.28B |
| 24h volume | $526.27K DEX | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $404.30K | $347.29K |
| FDV | $484.03M | $11.73B |
| Holders | 5,669 | 173,867 |
| Age (days) | 171 | 355 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~75× the market cap of CHIP
- RAIN measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of CHIP
- RAIN measures ~31× the holder count of CHIP
- over the shared window CHIP moved +61.9% while RAIN moved −32.2%
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $404 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $347 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or RAIN?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $96.81M and RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $7.28B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or RAIN?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and RAIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-17 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show CHIP at +61.9% and RAIN at −32.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-17→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.