HostCBZEC vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
CBZEC (Base) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
CBZEC vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| CBZEC | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.08K | $0.01763 |
| Market cap | $8.37M | $11.67M |
| 24h volume | $2.29M DEX | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $316.04K | $301.30K |
| FDV | $8.37M | $124.98M |
| Holders | 2,622 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | 38 | 140 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CBZEC measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~2.5× the holder count of CBZEC
- over the shared window CBZEC moved −29.1% while PLAY moved −43.5%
What the data says
CBZEC
cbZEC at 0xb2000000000000000000008501b13360000cb2ec — Coinbase Wrapped ZEC — is the exchange-issued wrapped claim on Zcash on Base, just 20 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $8.4 million market cap across 2.9 thousand units.
The launch book is workable and the tape is hot: $316.0 thousand of tracked depth on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling eight times daily, a real trading book under a young float. What the snapshot cannot say is what the custody is worth: a wrapped claim's backing lives in the issuer's reserve, not on-chain at this address.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CBZEC or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: CBZEC (Base) measures $8.37M and PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CBZEC or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: CBZEC (Base) grades B and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CBZEC and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show CBZEC at −29.1% and PLAY at −43.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.