HostCARDS vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
CARDS (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
CARDS vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| CARDS | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1315 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $115.77M | — |
| 24h volume | $2.33M | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $851.42K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $241.65M | — |
| Holders | 23,933 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~2,651× the liquidity of CARDS
- RYY measures ~1,490× the 24h volume of CARDS
- over the shared window CARDS moved −5.32% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
CARDS
CARDS is Collector Crypt's token — a tokenized trading-card marketplace where physical cards (Pokémon, sports) sit in custody and trade as redeemable on-chain assets. The mint CARDSccUMFKoPRZxt5vt3ksUbxEFEcnZ3H2pd3dKxYjp is what our scan tracks: $115.8 million market cap ($242 million fully diluted), $851 thousand of pool liquidity, 23,933 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: RWA-collectible platforms are one of the more defensible crypto theses — real inventory, real redemption — and the two numbers that matter here are custody (the cards have to physically exist and ship) and the mcap-to-FDV gap (less than half the supply circulates). A real business underneath, with token-dilution mechanics on top.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CARDS or RYY?
By tracked market cap: CARDS (Solana) measures $115.77M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CARDS or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: CARDS (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CARDS and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show CARDS at −5.32% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
CARDS vs FKBCARDS vs CRDCARDS vs RDKCARDS vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.