HostCARDS vs QQQX — price, size and safety, side by side
CARDS (Solana) vs QQQX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
CARDS vs QQQX — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| CARDS | QQQX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2968 | $760.91 |
| Market cap | $172.63M | $62.91M |
| 24h volume | $10.29M DEX | $1.70M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.17M | $2.13M |
| FDV | $360.35M | $62.91M |
| Holders | 33,548 | 38,334 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- CARDS measures ~2.7× the market cap of QQQX
- CARDS measures ~6.0× the 24h volume of QQQX
- over the shared window CARDS moved +114% while QQQX moved +6.01%
What the data says
CARDS
CARDS is Collector Crypt's token — a tokenized trading-card marketplace where physical cards (Pokémon, sports) sit in custody and trade as redeemable on-chain assets. The mint CARDSccUMFKoPRZxt5vt3ksUbxEFEcnZ3H2pd3dKxYjp is what our scan tracks: $172.6 million market cap ($360 million fully diluted), $2.2 million of pool liquidity, 33,548 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest read: RWA-collectible platforms are one of the more defensible crypto theses — real inventory, real redemption — and the two numbers that matter here are custody (the cards have to physically exist and ship) and the mcap-to-FDV gap (less than half the supply circulates). A real business underneath, with token-dilution mechanics on top.
QQQX
QQQX is a tokenized Nasdaq-100 — one of Backed Finance's xStocks, designed to track the index ETF on-chain. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $62.9 million across 38,334 wallets on mint Xs8S1uUs1zvS2p7iwtsG3b6fkhpvmwz4GYU3gWAmWHZ.
The same custodial trust model as every xStock: the issuer holds the index exposure off-chain, and the token delivers its price — not the ETF's rights or its dividend machinery. For Nasdaq exposure inside Solana DeFi, that tradeoff is the entire product.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CARDS or QQQX?
By tracked market cap: CARDS (Solana) measures $172.63M and QQQX (Solana) measures $62.91M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CARDS or QQQX?
On the contract checks we publish: CARDS (Solana) grades A and QQQX (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CARDS and QQQX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show CARDS at +114% and QQQX at +6.01%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.