HostBYUSD vs EWBERA-4 — price, size and safety, side by side
BYUSD (Berachain) vs EWBERA-4 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BYUSD vs EWBERA-4 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| BYUSD | EWBERA-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9975 | $0.3062 |
| Market cap | $131.49K | — |
| 24h volume | $608.86 DEX | $5.57K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.68K | $1.42K |
| FDV | $131.49K | $445.89K |
| Holders | 5,123 | 7,799 |
| Age (days) | 595 | 508 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- BYUSD measures ~1.9× the liquidity of EWBERA-4
- EWBERA-4 measures ~9.2× the 24h volume of BYUSD
- EWBERA-4 measures ~1.5× the holder count of BYUSD
- over the shared window BYUSD moved −0.07% while EWBERA-4 moved −11.8%
What the data says
BYUSD
The contract behind BYUSD is about as reassuring as they come. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That's why BYUSD sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Looking at the market data, BYUSD shows $2.68K of on-chain liquidity, 5,123 wallets holding and an established record at 595 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $131.49K, the $2.68K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A 5,123-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
EWBERA-4
There's a small gap on this page — EWBERA-4's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, EWBERA-4 carries a $1.42K pool, 7,799 wallets holding and 508 days old as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $1.42K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 7,799-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BYUSD or EWBERA-4?
By tracked market cap: BYUSD (Berachain) measures $131.49K and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BYUSD or EWBERA-4?
On the contract checks we publish: BYUSD (Berachain) grades A and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BYUSD and EWBERA-4 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show BYUSD at −0.07% and EWBERA-4 at −11.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.