HostBTG vs 中国龙 — price, size and safety, side by side
BTG (BNB Chain) vs 中国龙 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
BTG vs 中国龙 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| BTG | 中国龙 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7423 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | $1.75M | — |
| 24h volume | $2.38M DEX | $1.55M DEX |
| Liquidity | $65.16K | $4.79 |
| FDV | $18.43M | $3.05M |
| Holders | 64,175 | 1,138,895 |
| Age (days) | 374 | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- BTG measures ~13,597× the liquidity of 中国龙
- BTG measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of 中国龙
- 中国龙 measures ~18× the holder count of BTG
- over the shared window BTG moved −19.4% while 中国龙 moved +135%
What the data says
BTG
Start with the good news — BTG's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason BTG's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On liquidity and holders, BTG shows $65.16K of on-chain liquidity, 64,175 wallets holding and an established record at 374 days as of 2026-10-09. The $65.16K pool against a ~$1.75M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The 64,175-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
中国龙
One detail on 中国龙 didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On liquidity and holders, 中国龙 shows $5 of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 1,138,895 and a brand-new record at 1 days as of 2026-10-09. Read $5 of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. With 1,138,895 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created 中国龙 holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BTG or 中国龙?
By tracked market cap: BTG (BNB Chain) measures $1.75M and 中国龙 (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BTG or 中国龙?
On the contract checks we publish: BTG (BNB Chain) grades A and 中国龙 (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BTG and 中国龙 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show BTG at −19.4% and 中国龙 at +135%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.