HostBONK vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
BONK (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
BONK vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| BONK | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000002708 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $217.70M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.23M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $943.68K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $217.70M | — |
| Holders | 1,019,204 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~1,847× the liquidity of BONK
- RDK measures ~2,352× the 24h volume of BONK
- over the shared window BONK moved −12.9% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
BONK
BONK is what a memecoin looks like after it survives. Airdropped to the Solana community in the last week of 2022 — when the chain was being written off in the wake of FTX — it has outlived thousands of imitators and, as of the September 16, 2026 snapshot, sits at roughly $217.7 million of market capitalization with just over one million holders on mint DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263. A seven-figure holder count is rare air: it means ownership is spread across a genuine crowd rather than a handful of wallets deciding the chart.
Structurally, the boxes a memecoin can tick are ticked. Both the mint authority and the freeze authority read revoked in the snapshot — supply is capped at what exists, and no one can freeze a holder's balance to block a sell. The snapshot also puts the creator-associated wallet's share at effectively zero. These are exactly the checks that fail on the launches that end up on our obituaries pages, and BONK passes all of them, which is a real statement about downside mechanics even though it says nothing about price.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BONK or RDK?
By tracked market cap: BONK (Solana) measures $217.70M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BONK or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: BONK (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BONK and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show BONK at −12.9% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
BONK vs RYYBONK vs FKBBONK vs CRDBONK vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.