HostBNSOL vs INF — price, size and safety, side by side
BNSOL (Solana) vs INF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BNSOL vs INF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| BNSOL | INF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $118.43 | $151.77 |
| Market cap | $1.23B | $233.62M |
| 24h volume | $68.79K DEX | $2.68M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $1.23B | $233.62M |
| Holders | 14,515 | 42,083 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- BNSOL measures ~5.3× the market cap of INF
- INF measures ~39× the 24h volume of BNSOL
- INF measures ~2.9× the holder count of BNSOL
What the data says
BNSOL
BNSOL is Binance's answer to a question its users kept asking: can SOL held on the world's largest exchange earn staking yield without leaving the Binance ecosystem? Stake through Binance and you receive BNSOL, a receipt token that appreciates against SOL as validator rewards accrue. The October 6, 2026 snapshot puts the pool behind mint BNso1VUJnh4zcfpZa6986Ea66P6TCp59hvtNJ8b1X85 at roughly $1.23 billion — the largest single entry in this site's LST tail — across 14,515 on-chain holders, a count that understates its reach because most BNSOL never leaves Binance's internal ledgers.
The standard liquid-staking translation applies: supply minting and burning with deposits is the mechanism, not a red flag, and the holder-protecting check — the freeze authority — reads revoked in this snapshot. What distinguishes BNSOL from a protocol-native LST like jitoSOL is who stands in the middle: an exchange-branded LST inherits exchange trust. The stake, the validator selection, and the redemption path all run through Binance's infrastructure, so alongside the usual LST risks (market discount to backing under stress, smart-contract surface) you are holding a view on Binance itself — its solvency, its regulatory weather, its operational choices.
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BNSOL or INF?
By tracked market cap: BNSOL (Solana) measures $1.23B and INF (Solana) measures $233.62M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BNSOL or INF?
On the contract checks we publish: BNSOL (Solana) grades A and INF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BNSOL and INF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show BNSOL at +1.88% and INF at +1.93%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.