HostBLZE vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
BLZE (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
BLZE vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| BLZE | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00009547 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $601.24K | — |
| 24h volume | $1.00K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $3.66K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $601.24K | — |
| Holders | 211,327 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~463,456× the liquidity of BLZE
- CCV measures ~2,737,503× the 24h volume of BLZE
- over the shared window BLZE moved +54.2% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
BLZE
BLZE is the governance token of BlazeStake, one of Solana's longer-running stake pools, distributed widely to the pool's stakers — which is how a token capitalized around $601 thousand in the September 16, 2026 snapshot comes to have 211,327 holders. That holder count is an airdrop artifact, not a demand signal: it measures how many wallets ever received BLZE, and says nothing about how many still care.
Contract mechanics are as clean as they come. Mint and freeze authorities are both revoked in the snapshot on mint BLZEEuZUBVqFhj8adcCFPJvPVCiCyVmh3hkJMrU8KuJA, and the creator-associated wallet holds 0.02% of supply. Nothing in the token's structure can dilute a holder or block an exit — the 85/100 grade loses its points on the market side alone.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLZE or CCV?
By tracked market cap: BLZE (Solana) measures $601.24K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLZE or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: BLZE (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLZE and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show BLZE at +54.2% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
BLZE vs RYYBLZE vs FKBBLZE vs CRDBLZE vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.