HostBLBAUSD vs SHRAMP — price, size and safety, side by side
BLBAUSD (Monad) vs SHRAMP (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
BLBAUSD vs SHRAMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| BLBAUSD | SHRAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.01 | $0.0001801 |
| Market cap | — | $215.07K |
| 24h volume | $200.86K DEX | $1.77K DEX |
| Liquidity | $56.33K | $20.68K |
| FDV | $1.16M | $215.07K |
| Holders | 5 | 3,224 |
| Age (days) | 31 | 306 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BLBAUSD measures ~2.7× the liquidity of SHRAMP
- BLBAUSD measures ~114× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- SHRAMP measures ~645× the holder count of BLBAUSD
- over the shared window BLBAUSD moved +0.61% while SHRAMP moved +11.0%
What the data says
BLBAUSD
BLBAUSD is Blueberry's AUSD receipt token on Monad — the position token of a lending-market deposit in Blueberry Protocol, denominated in AUSD. The contract 0xc2ddc1004ca0d6cc4bfd1dcd03dcf855bed8e670 is what our scan tracks: $56 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026, priced essentially at a dollar.
Receipt tokens deserve their own read: the dollar price is accounting, not a stablecoin peg — what backs it is a claim on a lending pool inside Blueberry, so the risk stack is protocol solvency plus the AUSD backing beneath it. Pool liquidity on receipts like this is thin by design (most holders hold, not trade) — redemptions at size go through the protocol, not the market.
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, with 3,224 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $215.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $20.7 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLBAUSD or SHRAMP?
By tracked market cap: BLBAUSD (Monad) measures — and SHRAMP (Monad) measures $215.07K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLBAUSD or SHRAMP?
On the contract checks we publish: BLBAUSD (Monad) grades B and SHRAMP (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLBAUSD and SHRAMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show BLBAUSD at +0.61% and SHRAMP at +11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.