HostBLBAUSD vs EMO — price, size and safety, side by side
BLBAUSD (Monad) vs EMO (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
BLBAUSD vs EMO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| BLBAUSD | EMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.01 | $0.0007934 |
| Market cap | — | $836.72K |
| 24h volume | $200.86K DEX | $6.74K DEX |
| Liquidity | $56.33K | $40.53K |
| FDV | $1.16M | $834.16K |
| Holders | 5 | 6,306 |
| Age (days) | 31 | 316 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BLBAUSD measures ~30× the 24h volume of EMO
- EMO measures ~1,261× the holder count of BLBAUSD
- over the shared window BLBAUSD moved +0.61% while EMO moved −9.53%
What the data says
BLBAUSD
BLBAUSD is Blueberry's AUSD receipt token on Monad — the position token of a lending-market deposit in Blueberry Protocol, denominated in AUSD. The contract 0xc2ddc1004ca0d6cc4bfd1dcd03dcf855bed8e670 is what our scan tracks: $56 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026, priced essentially at a dollar.
Receipt tokens deserve their own read: the dollar price is accounting, not a stablecoin peg — what backs it is a claim on a lending pool inside Blueberry, so the risk stack is protocol solvency plus the AUSD backing beneath it. Pool liquidity on receipts like this is thin by design (most holders hold, not trade) — redemptions at size go through the protocol, not the market.
EMO
EMO at 0x81a224f8a62f52bde942dbf23a56df77a10b7777 — deployed under the name "emonad" — is a Monad community token 298 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at an $836.7 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep against the small cap: $40.5 thousand of tracked depth on $7.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a proportionate pool with a quiet tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLBAUSD or EMO?
By tracked market cap: BLBAUSD (Monad) measures — and EMO (Monad) measures $836.72K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLBAUSD or EMO?
On the contract checks we publish: BLBAUSD (Monad) grades B and EMO (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLBAUSD and EMO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show BLBAUSD at +0.61% and EMO at −9.53%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.