HostBLAST vs ESE — price, size and safety, side by side
BLAST (Blast) vs ESE (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
BLAST vs ESE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| BLAST | ESE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001971 | $0.0008439 |
| Market cap | $2.64M | $752.15K |
| 24h volume | $4.12K DEX | $6.52 DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.52K | $867.75 |
| FDV | $3.72M | $15.95K |
| Holders | 279,524 | 42,894 |
| Age (days) | 836 | 397 |
| Safety grade | C | E |
Where they differ
- BLAST measures ~3.5× the market cap of ESE
- BLAST measures ~5.2× the liquidity of ESE
- BLAST measures ~632× the 24h volume of ESE
- BLAST measures ~6.5× the holder count of ESE
- over the shared window BLAST moved −46.9% while ESE moved −9.63%
What the data says
BLAST
One thing stands out on BLAST, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why BLAST is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, BLAST carries a $4.52K pool, 279,524 wallets holding and an established record at 836 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $4.52K pool against a ~$2.64M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so BLAST's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A holder base of 279,524 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
ESE
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on ESE to flag. Right now ESE's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. It's the main reason the read sits at 34/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, ESE carries thin liquidity of $868, a holder base of 42,894 and an established record at 397 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $868 pool against a ~$752.15K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so ESE's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. 42,894 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLAST or ESE?
By tracked market cap: BLAST (Blast) measures $2.64M and ESE (Blast) measures $752.15K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLAST or ESE?
On the contract checks we publish: BLAST (Blast) grades C and ESE (Blast) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLAST and ESE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show BLAST at −46.9% and ESE at −9.63%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.