HostBLACK vs WBTC.E — price, size and safety, side by side
BLACK (Avalanche) vs WBTC.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
BLACK vs WBTC.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| BLACK | WBTC.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006383 | $84.31K |
| Market cap | $1.82M | $26.50M |
| 24h volume | $108.99K | $31.42K |
| Liquidity | $398.67K | $394.45K |
| FDV | $1.84M | $26.50M |
| Holders | 19,358 | 8,988 |
| Age (days) | 430 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC.E measures ~15× the market cap of BLACK
- BLACK measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
- BLACK measures ~2.2× the holder count of WBTC.E
- over the shared window BLACK moved +136% while WBTC.E moved +0.42%
What the data says
BLACK
BLACK at 0xcd94a87696fac69edae3a70fe5725307ae1c43f6 — the BLACKHOLE token — is an Avalanche asset 430 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $1.8 million market cap sitting effectively equal to its $1.8 million fully-diluted figure on 284.6 million units: the float is out.
19,358 holders share the book, with the ten largest wallets holding 45.8% of supply — a moderate top bracket for the chain. The counterweights sit in the contract: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. $398.7 thousand of tracked depth reads deep against the small cap, though the $7.9 thousand daily volume is quiet.
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $26.5 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $394.5 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLACK or WBTC.E?
By tracked market cap: BLACK (Avalanche) measures $1.82M and WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $26.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLACK or WBTC.E?
On the contract checks we publish: BLACK (Avalanche) grades B and WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLACK and WBTC.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show BLACK at +136% and WBTC.E at +0.42%.
More comparisons
BLACK vs VIRTUALBLACK vs CODECICP vs BLACKBLACK vs MCDXWBTC.E vs ZCATMCDX vs WBTC.ECODEC vs WBTC.EVIRTUAL vs WBTC.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.