Host牛来 vs CTM — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (BNB Chain) vs CTM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
牛来 vs CTM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| 牛来 | CTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06338 | $0.2128 |
| Market cap | $79.34M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.47M DEX | $2.08M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.42M | $1.44M |
| FDV | $79.34M | $69.11M |
| Holders | 64,716 | 4,989 |
| Age (days) | 52 | 189 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- 牛来 measures ~13× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window 牛来 moved −39.4% while CTM moved −18.1%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $79.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.4 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our October 9, 2026 read shows $1.4 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or CTM?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $79.34M and CTM (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or CTM?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A and CTM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and CTM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at −39.4% and CTM at −18.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.