HostBASECAT vs LONG — price, size and safety, side by side
BASECAT (Base) vs LONG (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-05.
BASECAT vs LONG — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-05
| BASECAT | LONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01269 | $0.0000003079 |
| Market cap | $19.61M | $232.77K |
| 24h volume | $458.46K DEX | $36.60M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.85M | $1.83M |
| FDV | $19.61M | $232.77K |
| Holders | 9,121 | 6,140 |
| Age (days) | 30 | 0 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BASECAT measures ~84× the market cap of LONG
- LONG measures ~80× the 24h volume of BASECAT
- over the shared window BASECAT moved −30.9% while LONG moved −99.7%
What the data says
BASECAT
BASECAT on Base — contract 0xb2000000000000000000004c27f6523082f41d01 — is the largest survivor of the `0xb20000…` factory deployer indexed here: $1.9 million of liquidity and $5.2 million of daily volume at its October 6, 2026 snapshot, sixteen days old — ancient by factory-cohort standards.
Sixteen days is the meaningful number: the sibling contracts from this deployer (cookcat, plumber, dogue) were all single-digit days old at their snapshots — Basecat is the one the market kept. A 16x daily turnover on $330k of liquidity is still manufacturing-flavored flow, but survival past two weeks separates it from the churn that dies in 72 hours.
LONG
This is the second LONG row on Base — the shallower sibling at 0x4a72d6f1fd7582f1246ce9e5b248083d938b2b07, where our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity against the deeper row's ~$5 million.
The honest note is the same one every sibling pair earns: same ticker, different contract, and the depth split says the market mostly chose the other one — which doesn't make this one illegitimate, just the less-liquid venue for the name. The mint above is the identity this page's figures describe.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BASECAT or LONG?
By tracked market cap: BASECAT (Base) measures $19.61M and LONG (Base) measures $232.77K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BASECAT or LONG?
On the contract checks we publish: BASECAT (Base) grades B and LONG (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BASECAT and LONG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-05, the measured snapshots show BASECAT at −30.9% and LONG at −99.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.