HostAURA vs OPENAI — price, size and safety, side by side
AURA (Polygon) vs OPENAI (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-02.
AURA vs OPENAI — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-02
| AURA | OPENAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2737 | $0.0000009391 |
| Market cap | — | $2.55M |
| 24h volume | $27.48K DEX | $24.07M DEX |
| Liquidity | $865.15K | $9.03M |
| FDV | $3.43M | $2.55M |
| Holders | 2,723 | 5,065 |
| Age (days) | 103 | 0 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- OPENAI measures ~10× the liquidity of AURA
- OPENAI measures ~876× the 24h volume of AURA
- OPENAI measures ~1.9× the holder count of AURA
- over the shared window AURA moved −26.7% while OPENAI moved −98.1%
What the data says
AURA
AURA — Auralith — is an 88-day-old Polygon token at 0xd9d12f43918363cea1c0b62d16f1f81b8eae91e0, priced at a $3.4 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The venue side is the healthiest in this batch relative to size: $865 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is deep for a $4.5M cap — a quarter of the valuation sits in the exit book. What isn't measured matters as much: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
OPENAI
OPENAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (90/100, 2026-10-09).
On the trading data, OPENAI shows deep liquidity of $9.03M, 5,065 wallets holding and a brand-new 0-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $2.55M in market cap, the $9.03M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 5,065-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OPENAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AURA or OPENAI?
By tracked market cap: AURA (Polygon) measures — and OPENAI (Base) measures $2.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AURA or OPENAI?
On the contract checks we publish: AURA (Polygon) grades B and OPENAI (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AURA and OPENAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-02, the measured snapshots show AURA at −26.7% and OPENAI at −98.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.