HostATTN vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
ATTN (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
ATTN vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| ATTN | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01904 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $2.70M | — |
| 24h volume | $109.52K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $94.66K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $2.70M | — |
| Holders | 1,124 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~23,841× the liquidity of ATTN
- RYY measures ~31,741× the 24h volume of ATTN
- over the shared window ATTN moved +4917% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
ATTN
ATTN — Attention Mine — is a Solana attention-economy token, and it wins the attn slug over a smaller sibling ("attn markets"). The mint H1kXUqEPkQNNeNjGNN5tuHf3nsQK2vB1jUA9c4RggpUf is what our scan tracks: $2.7 million market cap, $95 thousand of liquidity and 1,124 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: attention-marketplace tokens price on the meta they are literally named for — fitting, if circular. The holder count is concentrated, the pool is functional, and the sibling ATTN exists to catch exactly the buyers who do not check the mint. The contract above is the slug winner.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATTN or RYY?
By tracked market cap: ATTN (Solana) measures $2.70M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATTN or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: ATTN (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATTN and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show ATTN at +4917% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ATTN vs FKBATTN vs CRDATTN vs RDKATTN vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.