HostATOM vs XVVS — price, size and safety, side by side
ATOM (Cronos) vs XVVS (Cronos) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ATOM vs XVVS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ATOM | XVVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.76 | $0.000001373 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $23.65K DEX | $4.35K DEX |
| Liquidity | $57.72K | $2.84K |
| FDV | $810.62K | $5.55M |
| Holders | 12,051 | 12,603 |
| Age (days) | 1,757 | 1,418 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- ATOM measures ~20× the liquidity of XVVS
- ATOM measures ~5.4× the 24h volume of XVVS
What the data says
ATOM
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on ATOM to flag. The mint and freeze levers on ATOM's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. Until that changes, ATOM stays around 21/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, ATOM is showing a $57.72K pool, 12,051 holders and an established record at 1,757 days as of 2026-10-09. Treat $57.72K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. 12,051 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATOM holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
XVVS
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on XVVS. The mint function on XVVS's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. That's what's holding the score at 60/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, XVVS shows $2.84K of on-chain liquidity, 12,603 wallets holding and an established 1,418-day history as of 2026-10-09. Read $2.84K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. The 12,603-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of XVVS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATOM or XVVS?
By tracked market cap: ATOM (Cronos) measures — and XVVS (Cronos) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATOM or XVVS?
On the contract checks we publish: ATOM (Cronos) grades E and XVVS (Cronos) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATOM and XVVS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ATOM at −10.0% and XVVS at −7.13%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.