HostATOM vs LTC — price, size and safety, side by side
ATOM (Cronos) vs LTC (Cronos) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ATOM vs LTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ATOM | LTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.76 | $60.07 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $23.65K DEX | $3.98K DEX |
| Liquidity | $57.72K | $28.91K |
| FDV | $810.62K | $340.82K |
| Holders | 12,051 | 2,481 |
| Age (days) | 1,757 | 1,635 |
| Safety grade | E | E |
Where they differ
- ATOM measures ~2.0× the liquidity of LTC
- ATOM measures ~5.9× the 24h volume of LTC
- ATOM measures ~4.9× the holder count of LTC
- over the shared window ATOM moved −10.0% while LTC moved −4.80%
What the data says
ATOM
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on ATOM to flag. The mint and freeze levers on ATOM's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. Until that changes, ATOM stays around 21/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, ATOM is showing a $57.72K pool, 12,051 holders and an established record at 1,757 days as of 2026-10-09. Treat $57.72K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. 12,051 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATOM holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
LTC
One thing stands out on LTC, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. That's what's holding the score at 14/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where LTC stands today: thin liquidity of $28.91K, 2,481 wallets holding and 1,635 days old as of 2026-10-09. Read $28.91K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 2,481 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATOM or LTC?
By tracked market cap: ATOM (Cronos) measures — and LTC (Cronos) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATOM or LTC?
On the contract checks we publish: ATOM (Cronos) grades E and LTC (Cronos) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATOM and LTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ATOM at −10.0% and LTC at −4.80%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.