HostARX vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
ARX (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
ARX vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| ARX | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1722 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $33.82M | — |
| 24h volume | $57.87K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $461.89K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $161.94M | — |
| Holders | 3,892 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~3,668× the liquidity of ARX
- CCV measures ~47,367× the 24h volume of ARX
- over the shared window ARX moved +23.1% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
ARX
ARX is Arcium's token — a confidential-computing network for Solana (multi-party computation so contracts can work on encrypted state), one of the more technical infrastructure bets in this tier. The mint ARXwZkNAtzPfdcoqQiduJn8EPv9fKiDfGn2KyggyDrFs is what our scan tracks: $33.8 million market cap ($161.9 million fully diluted), $462 thousand of pool liquidity, 3,892 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest note: real cryptography and a real use case — the open question is whether confidential compute gets adopted fast enough to matter for a token, and the mcap-to-FDV gap (about a fifth circulating) is the float math to watch. A same-ticker ARX xStock also exists in this corpus — the mint above is Arcium's.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARX or CCV?
By tracked market cap: ARX (Solana) measures $33.82M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARX or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: ARX (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARX and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show ARX at +23.1% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ARX vs RYYARX vs FKBARX vs CRDARX vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.