HostAPYUSD vs ENA — price, size and safety, side by side
APYUSD (Ethereum) vs ENA (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
APYUSD vs ENA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| APYUSD | ENA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.35 | $0.1963 |
| Market cap | $162.66M | $2.91B |
| 24h volume | $2.18M DEX | $3.46M DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.09M | $6.72M |
| FDV | $155.95M | $3.26B |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 191 | 902 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ENA measures ~18× the market cap of APYUSD
- ENA measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of APYUSD
What the data says
APYUSD
One detail on APYUSD didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the trading data, APYUSD shows $9.09M of on-chain liquidity and a maturing 191-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $162.66M in market cap, the $9.09M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see.
ENA
ENA is Ethena's governance token — the asset of the protocol behind USDe, the synthetic dollar that became one of the largest stables on earth by running a delta-neutral hedge rather than holding cash. The deployment 0x57e114b691db790c35207b2e685d4a43181e6061 is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $6.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest shape: ENA's value rides on USDe's durability — a bet on the hedge machinery surviving the negative-funding stress case it was designed for but hasn't fully faced — plus the fee economics of Ethena's stack (USDe, sUSDe, USDtb, and now USDat). It's a governance claim on real, measurable protocol revenue, which puts it a tier above pure attention assets while keeping the tail risk its whole design carries.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APYUSD or ENA?
By tracked market cap: APYUSD (Ethereum) measures $162.66M and ENA (Ethereum) measures $2.91B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APYUSD or ENA?
On the contract checks we publish: APYUSD (Ethereum) grades B and ENA (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APYUSD and ENA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show APYUSD at −1.39% and ENA at −6.09%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.