HostAPRMON vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
APRMON (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
APRMON vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| APRMON | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02903 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $670.50K | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $19.11K | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $9.95K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $670.74K | $3.20K |
| Holders | 5,017 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 293 | 298 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- APRMON measures ~191× the market cap of MCA
- APRMON measures ~4.3× the liquidity of MCA
- APRMON measures ~115× the 24h volume of MCA
- APRMON measures ~1.8× the holder count of MCA
What the data says
APRMON
APRMON — aPriori's Monad liquid-staking token — is one of the first LSTs in this index on Monad: 0x0c65a0bc65a5d819235b71f554d210d3f80e0852, 293 days old on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $670.5 thousand market cap across 5,017 wallets.
The structure flag is the one an LST can't avoid: the token sits behind a proxy, so the receipt logic is upgradeable — normal for staking infrastructure, real nonetheless. The float is fairly concentrated (top ten hold about 68.6%), and the venue is thin — $9.9 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, so exits are rationed by the pool, not the code.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APRMON or MCA?
By tracked market cap: APRMON (Monad) measures $670.50K and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APRMON or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: APRMON (Monad) grades B and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APRMON and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show APRMON at 0.00% and MCA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
APRMON vs WCTWMTX vs APRMONASTROID vs APRMONAPRMON vs EMINIMCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.