HostAPE vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
APE (Ethereum) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-28.
APE vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| APE | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1584 | $0.08254 |
| Market cap | $158.40M | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $90.78K | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $270.24K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $158.40M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 189,466 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | — | 234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~1.5× the market cap of APE
- ZAMA measures ~78× the 24h volume of APE
- APE measures ~54× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
APE
APE passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with the structural risks already off the table.
Looking at the market data, APE shows a $270.24K pool and a holder base of 189,466 as of 2026-09-27. Set the $270.24K pool against roughly $158.40M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 189,466-wallet holder base is a genuine strength on top of that: distribution that broad is hard to manufacture, and it means no single wallet quietly owns the float. Reassuringly, the wallet that created APE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APE or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: APE (Ethereum) measures $158.40M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APE or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: APE (Ethereum) grades A and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APE and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show APE at 0.00% and ZAMA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDUC vs APEMYX vs APEBERN vs APEAPE vs BTRGM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.