HostAMZNC vs PROS — price, size and safety, side by side
AMZNC (Base) vs PROS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
AMZNC vs PROS — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| AMZNC | PROS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $249.91 | $0.5889 |
| Market cap | $2.52M | $2.69M |
| 24h volume | $6.60M DEX | $2.59M DEX |
| Liquidity | $656.42K | $570.37K |
| FDV | $2.34M | $2.68M |
| Holders | 2,529 | 3,967 |
| Age (days) | 36 | 149 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AMZNC measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of PROS
- PROS measures ~1.6× the holder count of AMZNC
- over the shared window AMZNC moved −1.41% while PROS moved +5.41%
What the data says
AMZNC
AMZNC on Base — 0xb200000000000000000000d9192b6b456483c2e8 — is the 0xb200… family's Amazon wrapper: $253.49 in the October 9, 2026 snapshot, tracking the stock, on $656 thousand of liquidity and roughly $5.0 million of daily volume. Eleven days old, ~5x turnover — the family's hot-start signature.
With seven family members now indexed, the pattern worth stating is portfolio-level: the family is building a tokenized S&P basket on Base — Tesla, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, MicroStrategy, SpaceX, Sandisk — all from one deployer. That concentration is the family's real risk model: not seven independent counterparty questions but one issuer question asked nine times. If the issuer's custody arrangement is sound, the family is uniformly sound; if it isn't, the family fails together.
PROS
PROS — Wrapped PROS on Base, 0x8b7dde054be9d180c1be7fae0874697374a49832 — is the wrapped form of a token with a real home elsewhere: PROS is the Prosper/Prosper-predict ecosystem token, and a wrapped ERC-20 on Base is the cross-chain form of it. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $570 thousand of liquidity and roughly $2.7 million of daily volume.
A wrapped token's risk model differs from a native one: the honest questions are which bridge or custodian mints the wrapper, whether the canonical contract is the one at this address, and what the redemption path back to the native asset looks like. $0.44 per token across 103 days of tracked age describes a wrapper with a sustained market — the depth to trade, and the standing caveat that wrapper integrity is only as good as its bridge.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AMZNC or PROS?
By tracked market cap: AMZNC (Base) measures $2.52M and PROS (Base) measures $2.69M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AMZNC or PROS?
On the contract checks we publish: AMZNC (Base) grades B and PROS (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AMZNC and PROS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show AMZNC at −1.41% and PROS at +5.41%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.