HostALEPH vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
ALEPH (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
ALEPH vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| ALEPH | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01023 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $78.75K | — |
| 24h volume | $37.06 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $18.09K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $78.75K | — |
| Holders | 1,239 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~109,739× the liquidity of ALEPH
- CRD measures ~108,684,242× the 24h volume of ALEPH
- over the shared window ALEPH moved −12.1% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
ALEPH
One detail on ALEPH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-16 snapshot: its authority state. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, ALEPH is showing thin liquidity of $18.09K and 1,239 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Encouragingly, that $18.09K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $78.75K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 1,239-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ALEPH or CRD?
By tracked market cap: ALEPH (Solana) measures $78.75K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ALEPH or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: ALEPH (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ALEPH and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show ALEPH at −12.1% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ALEPH vs RYYALEPH vs FKBALEPH vs RDKALEPH vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.