HostAGVE vs SWASH — price, size and safety, side by side
AGVE (Gnosis) vs SWASH (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
AGVE vs SWASH — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| AGVE | SWASH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $35.26 | $0.0008136 |
| Market cap | $3.63M | $746.52K |
| 24h volume | $39.84 DEX | $318.85 DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.14K | $7.09K |
| FDV | $3.63M | $20.88K |
| Holders | 8,365 | 11,753 |
| Age (days) | 1,736 | 1,736 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- AGVE measures ~4.9× the market cap of SWASH
- SWASH measures ~8.0× the 24h volume of AGVE
- over the shared window AGVE moved −2.79% while SWASH moved +8.43%
What the data says
AGVE
The most important thing to know about AGVE is its authority setup. Right now AGVE's contract keeps its pause or blacklist lever (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can freeze or block token transfers at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 45/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, AGVE is showing a $7.14K pool, 8,365 holders and 1,736 days old as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $7.14K pool against a ~$3.63M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so AGVE's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. The 8,365-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of AGVE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SWASH
The headline on SWASH is a permission the team still holds. Right now SWASH's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, SWASH shows thin liquidity of $7.09K, 11,753 holders and an established 1,736-day history as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $7.09K pool against a ~$746.52K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so SWASH's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A 11,753-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AGVE or SWASH?
By tracked market cap: AGVE (Gnosis) measures $3.63M and SWASH (Gnosis) measures $746.52K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AGVE or SWASH?
On the contract checks we publish: AGVE (Gnosis) grades D and SWASH (Gnosis) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AGVE and SWASH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show AGVE at −2.79% and SWASH at +8.43%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.