HostAERO vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
AERO (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-07.
AERO vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-08-31 to 2026-10-07
| AERO | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9243 | $0.0001305 |
| Market cap | $817.50M | $294.67K |
| 24h volume | $14.64M DEX | $25.77M DEX |
| Liquidity | $32.10M | $9.73M |
| FDV | $1.63B | $294.67K |
| Holders | 754,575 | 4,887 |
| Age (days) | 681 | 0 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- AERO measures ~2,774× the market cap of 牛来
- AERO measures ~3.3× the liquidity of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of AERO
- AERO measures ~154× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window AERO moved +67.6% while 牛来 moved +27.7%
What the data says
AERO
AERO is Aerodrome Finance's token — and Aerodrome is not just another DEX, it is the central liquidity hub of Base: the ve(3,3) emissions engine (a Velodrome fork) that routes rewards to pools by veAERO voter preference, making it the venue where most serious Base liquidity is deposited. The contract 0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631 is the canonical Base deployment; our October 9, 2026 read shows $32.1 million in the tracked pools themselves — a separate number from the far larger volume the exchange routes daily.
The honest shape: AERO's price is a bet on the emissions flywheel — votes direct emissions, emissions attract liquidity, liquidity attracts volume, volume attracts votes. Flywheels run beautifully in both directions, and a token whose demand depends on perpetual emissions demand carries reflexivity risk in full. The ve-lock does damp the circulating float, which is the honest counterweight.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AERO or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: AERO (Base) measures $817.50M and 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AERO or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: AERO (Base) grades B and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AERO and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-31 and 2026-10-07, the measured snapshots show AERO at +67.6% and 牛来 at +27.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-31→2026-10-07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.