Open app

ADI vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side

ADI (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

ADIB

$8.09
ADI on Ethereum
Trade ADI
vs

RDKB

$2.07K
Rudake on Base
Trade RDK

ADI vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
ADI 0.00%  ·  RDK 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
ADIRDK
Price$8.09$2.07K
Market cap
24h volume$944.99K$2.89B
Liquidity$2.53M$1.74B
FDV
Holders
Age (days)2631
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

ADI

ADI is a small-cap token our scan tracks at contract 0x8b1484d57abbe239bb280661377363b03c89caea — the September 8, 2026 snapshot shows $2.5 million of pool liquidity, respectable depth for its cohort.

The honest note: single-name tokens at this size live or die on a thin set of facts — who issues it, what accrues to it, and whether the liquidity is locked or one withdrawal away from gone. Verify those three before anything else; pool depth alone says nothing about permanence.

Full ADI safety read →

RDK

Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.

Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.

Full RDK safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, ADI or RDK?

By tracked market cap: ADI (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, ADI or RDK?

On the contract checks we publish: ADI (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have ADI and RDK performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show ADI at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.

More comparisons

ADI vs RYYADI vs FKBADI vs CRDADI vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.