Host2Z vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
2Z (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
2Z vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| 2Z | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04698 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $158.30M | — |
| 24h volume | $276.23K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $306.11K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $456.19M | — |
| Holders | 9,467 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~6,485× the liquidity of 2Z
- CRD measures ~14,581× the 24h volume of 2Z
- over the shared window 2Z moved −7.73% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
2Z
2Z is DoubleZero's token — a genuinely unusual infrastructure play: a dedicated fiber network built for validator and sequencer traffic, selling the pitch that blockchain consensus is bottlenecked by the public internet. The mint J6pQQ3FAcJQeWPPGppWRb4nM8jU3wLyYbRrLh7feMfvd is what our scan tracks: $158.3 million market cap ($456.2 million fully diluted), $306 thousand of pool liquidity, 9,467 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: real engineering, real backers, and a thesis that is either the next infra primitive or a solution to a problem most chains won't pay for — the mcap-to-FDV gap (about a third circulating) is the number that decides how much of the story you're buying at what price.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 2Z or CRD?
By tracked market cap: 2Z (Solana) measures $158.30M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 2Z or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: 2Z (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 2Z and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show 2Z at −7.73% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
2Z vs RYY2Z vs FKB2Z vs RDK2Z vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.